LICQual Level 3 Certificate in Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) in
Electrical
Quality / Safety Audit Review
Knowledge Providing Task
Quality and Safety Audit Review in Electrical QA/QC Explained
Purpose
This Knowledge Providing Task is designed to:
- Equip learners with practical skills to review electrical QA/QC audit or inspection reports.
- Develop the ability to identify non-compliance issues, prioritize corrective actions, and improve safety and quality.
- Apply UK legislation and standards (BS 7671, Electricity at Work Regulations 1989, Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, ISO 9001:2015) to vocational electrical scenarios.
- Build analytical and decision-making skills to prevent incidents and ensure compliance.
- Distinguish between QA (preventive) and QC (verification) actions within electrical projects.
- Provide portfolio-ready evidence demonstrating workplace competency in QA/QC inspections.
This task focuses on vocational, competency-based skills, not purely academic theory.
Vocational Scenario – Sample Audit Report
Project: Commercial Electrical Installation, London, UK
Audit Conducted By: QA/QC Electrical Officer
Date: 15 March 2025
Location: Main Distribution Panel (MDP) Room, 3rd Floor.
Audit Findings Table:
| Audit Item | Observation | Compliance Status | Risk Level | Notes |
| Cable Installation | PVC-insulated cables not colourcoded correctly | Noncompliant | Medium | Could cause phase identification errors |
| Circuit Breaker Ratings | Several breakers undersized for connected load | Noncompliant | High | Risk of overload & tripping |
| Earthing & Bonding | Main bonding conductor loosely connected | Noncompliant | High | Shock hazard during fault |
| PPE Compliance | Electricians not wearing gloves or boots | Noncompliant | Medium | Immediate safety risk |
| Documentation | Installation records incomplete | Noncompliant | Medium | Poor traceability |
| Functional Testing | Insulation resistance test not recorded | Noncompliant | High | Risk of unverified faults |
| Signage & Labelling | Circuit labels missing or incorrect | Noncompliant | Medium | Risk of incorrect maintenance |
Overall Audit Status: Non-compliant – corrective actions required before energisation.
Vocational Analysis
QA vs QC Principles Applied
Quality Assurance (QA) – Preventive Measures:
- Verify installer competency and training.
- Ensure correct materials and tools are used.
- Conduct risk assessments before energisation.
- Enforce PPE compliance and safety protocols.
Quality Control (QC) – Verification Measures:
- Inspect cable colour coding, breaker ratings, earthing, and bonding.
- Perform functional tests: continuity, insulation resistance, RCD operation, breaker verification.
- Verify documentation is complete and accurate for compliance audits.
- Confirm proper signage and labelling for safe maintenance.
Risk Assessment
| Hazard | Potential Consequence | Severity | Likelihood | QA Preventive Measures | QC Verification |
| Incorrect cable colour coding | Phase misidentification | Medium | High | Check cable type & phase coding preinstallation | Inspect installation & confirm correct colours |
| Undersized circuit breakers | Overload, fire | High | Medium | Verify load calculations & breaker selection | Test breaker rating & trip times |
| Loose bonding conductor | Electric shock | High | High | Preinstallation bonding checks | Retest earth continuity |
| PPE noncompliance | Electric shock | Medium | High | Enforce PPE policy | Observe compliance on site |
| Missing documentation | Audit failure, poor traceability | Medium | Medium | QA: enforce record keeping | QC: verify completion of records |
| Missing insulation resistance test | Faults undetected | High | Medium | Include tests in preenergisation checklist | Retest insulation and record |
| Missing signage | Incorrect maintenance | Medium | Medium | QA: ensure labelling | QC: verify labels are present |
Step-by-Step Audit Review Procedure
Step 1: Document Analysis
- Review all installation records, test logs, and previous inspection reports.
- Check for completeness, consistency, and adherence to ISO 9001 documentation standards.
Step 2: Hazard Identification
- List hazards identified during the audit.
- Assign risk levels: high, medium, or low.
- Assess potential impact on safety, compliance, and project timeline.
Step 3: QA Preventive Measures
- Verify installer competency and training records.
- Confirm correct materials, tools, and PPE are used.
- Conduct pre-energisation risk assessment.
Step 4: QC Verification Measures
- Inspect cable colour coding, breaker sizing, earthing, and bonding.
- Conduct functional tests: continuity, insulation resistance, breaker testing.
- Verify circuit labelling and signage.
- Ensure documentation reflects all checks and corrective actions.
Step 5: Corrective Actions & Follow-Up
- Assign responsibility for resolving non-compliances.
- Re-inspect corrected items and document results.
- Approve energisation only after all high-risk items are corrected.
Step 6: Continuous Improvement
- Record lessons learned for future audits.
- Update QA/QC procedures and checklists.
- Conduct team briefings to prevent recurrence of issues.
UK Legislation & Standards Referenced
| Legislation / Standard | Relevance | QA/QC Action |
| BS 7671:2018 (IET Wiring Regulations) | Installation standards, testing, earthing, labelling | Verify compliance through inspections and tests |
| Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 | Safe electrical systems and competent personnel | Preventive QA checks before energisation |
| Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 | Employee and public safety | Enforce PPE, safe workpractices |
| ISO 9001:2015 | QA/QC documentation, continual improvement | Maintain audit logs and corrective actions |
Guided Analytical Questions
- Identify the three highest risk non-compliances in the audit and explain why they are critical.
- Propose QA preventive measures for each high-risk item.
- Suggest QC verification steps to ensure corrections are effective.
- Explain how documentation and traceability support QA/QC compliance.
- Discuss the difference between QA and QC responsibilities demonstrated in this audit.
- Recommend procedural improvements to prevent recurrence of these issues.
- Discuss ethical considerations when deciding whether to approve energisation.
Vocational Tips
- Never approve energisation until all high-risk non-compliances are corrected.
- Maintain accurate documentation for compliance and ISO audits.
- Enforce PPE compliance for all personnel.
- Use audit findings to implement continuous improvement procedures.
- Cross-check installation with BS 7671, Electricity at Work Regulations, and ISO 9001.
- Communicate findings clearly with team and management to prevent incidents.
Learner Task
- Review the sample audit table and identify five non-compliances posing the highest safety risk.
- For each, describe QA preventive actions you would implement.
- Outline QC verification steps to confirm corrections are effective.
- Prepare a corrective action log detailing responsibilities, deadlines, and followup checks.
- Recommend two procedural improvements for future audits to reduce recurring non-compliance issues.
